Scale Invariant Fractal Revenue
- Stephen Sharma
- May 28
- 2 min read
To begin with, the idea of fractal revenue seems strange. How can a value that is associated with goods and services be fundamentally and isomorphically mapped to a scale invariant phenomenon? The idea goes that the revenue or money supply in a supply side economic system has a value that is represented through social outcomes at levels of organization at the individual, corporation or firm, government, and then rest of the world. The hierarchy that develops is one where the values that correspond to social outcomes are based in real world variables. Agriculture, precious metals, rare earth elements, superconducting devices, fusion power plants, and satellites all represent different scale invariant revenue values that correspond to different scales. These values are tied to the integral transform of time dependent supply side economic theory where the organic revenue changes in time and space. What is happening is the development of micro-jobs in some sense, the motion associated with value in the humanistic and larger cosmos. If the universe and the economy are tied through some sort of complex adaptive system, then it will be necessary to develop a valuation problem gearing social outcomes, wages, and prices, to the fundamental movement of the human form. Of course, bio-power is the slippery slope as the control of military expenditure is reaching a point where it dominates GDP. What has to occur is a paradigm shift in understanding scale invariant revenue as the basis for transactions at the small and large scale. By working towards a system where interaction is favored and exchange dominates over stagnation, one will be able to create wealth through social outcomes and interactions. These associations must be correlated to revenue if one maps the future economy to the decentralized future economy. The point is that the supply side economic system must develop invariants of value to correspond to true social outcomes and monetary policy.

Comments